1/1/2024 0 Comments Faceless person photo![]() ![]() ![]() It then names the guilty men and women, and demands that the House of Commons pass a resolution forbidding MPs to impugn its integrity.īefore I come to why all this is flawed, let me make two observations.įirst, although I believe it has blundered, I would not scrap the privileges committee. It suggests that there was a campaign to intimidate its members – while simultaneously insisting that they were not intimidated. The report declares, in portentous language, that “the privileges committee is therefore crucial to our democracy and must itself be protected”. To my mind, it exceeds the proper powers of the committee, prejudices free speech and opens its authors to the charge of one-sidedness. On Thursday, it published a second report, complaining that some MPs and peers had been poking fun at it, and inviting the House of Commons to consider taking action against them.Īmong others, it named Jacob Rees-Mogg, Nadine Dorries and Lord Cruddas, all of them hardline Johnsonians, white-cloaked members of the deposed leader’s kingsguard.Īt the risk of seeing my own name added to the offenders’ list, this new report is both self-important and self-contradictory. The privileges committee has taken grave exception to being criticised over its report into Boris Johnson. For another, any mention of marsupials might get you censured by the House of Commons. For one thing, it lacks the very real advantage of such a tribunal, namely speed. Part of measures to address this was the recent launch of a cooperative scheme to provide a platform and means of viably engaging the ex-agitators in more productive ventures.Whatever you do, don’t call it a kangaroo court. He said the overdependence on the stipends has introduced a culture of indolence and laziness among the youth. Ndiomu had, in the past, discouraged ex-agitators from depending on the monthly stipends of N65,000, and look to more sustainable means of livelihood. It’s not going to be business as usual,” he stated. But my conscience will not allow me soil my hands with such fraudulent operations. “We are aware that there are contractors who criminally connive with some staff of the PAP in the past to come up with bogus and fictitious contract sums. When you try to fight it, it fights back. How can only one person be receiving monthly stipends on several accounts linked to a single BVN? There are hundreds of cases like that. “We are aware that those fighting back are those who have issues with their BVNs. He recalled that in the past, ex-agitators had been used as conduit pipes to siphon monies illegally from the PAP, and thus urged contractors who have outstanding payments to follow due process in pursuing their cause, rather than spreading and sponsoring falsehood. He warned that those duly captured as PAP beneficiaries, who are taking part in spreading false narratives, will be dealt with in accordance with the extant laws of the programme. “We will ensure that we stand our ground to do what is right and just for our people, and vigorously pursue the intentions of the PAP,” Ndiomu affirmed. “If you like, blackmail me to the heavens and back, I will not succumb to fraudulent activities. ![]() In a statement Wednesday in Abuja, Ndiomu noted that recent media attacks from some miscreants parading themselves as ex-agitators, were being sponsored by faceless groups and individuals. He made the vow after he briefed the new National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu, on the activities of his office. Barry Ndiomu (rtd), has vowed not to be blackmailed to engage in fraudulent activities in the Amnesty Programme. The Interim Administrator of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP), Maj. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |